图书介绍
ARBITRATION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE INTERLOCUTORY AND HEARING PROBLEMS 1 SECOND EDITIONPDF|Epub|txt|kindle电子书版本网盘下载
![ARBITRATION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE INTERLOCUTORY AND HEARING PROBLEMS 1 SECOND EDITION](https://www.shukui.net/cover/2/34191584.jpg)
- D.MARK CATO 著
- 出版社:
- ISBN:1859781500
- 出版时间:1997
- 标注页数:551页
- 文件大小:33MB
- 文件页数:625页
- 主题词:
PDF下载
下载说明
ARBITRATION PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE INTERLOCUTORY AND HEARING PROBLEMS 1 SECOND EDITIONPDF格式电子书版下载
下载的文件为RAR压缩包。需要使用解压软件进行解压得到PDF格式图书。建议使用BT下载工具Free Download Manager进行下载,简称FDM(免费,没有广告,支持多平台)。本站资源全部打包为BT种子。所以需要使用专业的BT下载软件进行下载。如BitComet qBittorrent uTorrent等BT下载工具。迅雷目前由于本站不是热门资源。不推荐使用!后期资源热门了。安装了迅雷也可以迅雷进行下载!
(文件页数 要大于 标注页数,上中下等多册电子书除外)
注意:本站所有压缩包均有解压码: 点击下载压缩包解压工具
图书目录
1 APPOINTMENT1
1.1 Challenge to1
1.1.1 The respondent challenges the qualification of the arbitrator1
1.2 Disqualification for2
1.2.1 Approached by one party2
1.2.2 Called for interview by one party3
1.3 Estoppel4
1.3.1 Party who appoints an arbitrator subsequently estopped from ascer-taining that arbitrator has no authority4
1.3.2 Is a newly appointed solicitor estopped from questioning the arbitrator’s jurisdiction?6
1.4 Invalidity of7
1.4.1 Respondent developer claims that Chartered Institute of Arbitrators has made an invalid appointment and that the arbitrator has no power to call a preliminary meeting7
1.4.2 Appointment letter from nominating body signed by person other than that person named in contract8
1.4.3 Respondent asserts the claimant has not complied with precondition related to arbitrator’s appointment9
1.4.4 Respondent questions validity of appointment12
1.4.5 Party contends appointment invalid as made out of time13
1.4.6 Validity of unilateral reference for the appointment of an arbitrator16
1.4.7 Conditional appointment of arbitrator19
1.4.8 The appointment of an arbitrator must be made in strict compliance with the contract22
1.4.9 Party attempts to nominate third arbitrator23
1.4.10 Whether an appointment is valid where a joinder notice has been served prior to the date of that appointment24
1.5 Non-Acceptance of Terms25
1.5.1 Claimant refuses to accept arbitrator’s terms following appointment25
1.6 Parties’ Failure to Agree27
1.6.1 The dispute clause does not provide how an arbitrator should be appointed and the parties cannot agree27
1.7 Withdrawal/Resignation From28
1.7.1 Arbitrator attempts to withdraw after appointment28
1.7.2 Arbitrator invited to withdraw30
1.8 Wrong Reference33
1.8.1 Appointment letter from nominating body cites incorrect reference to Act33
1.8.2 Arbitrator’s qualifications do not meet specific requirements of arbi-tration agreement35
2 ARBITRATION AGREEMENT39
2.1 Ad hoc submissions39
2.1.1 Reference to arbitration after dispute arises39
2.1.2 Whether the subsequent conduct of the parties amounted to an "ad hoc"arbitration agreement41
2.2 Condition Precedent44
2.2.1 Whether arbitrator’s award is a condition precedent to a cause of action44
2.2.2 Where a dispute has to be referred to engineer’s decision as a condition precedent to arbitration46
2.3 Dispute as to Validity of50
2.3.1 Compliance with contract, prerequisite to trigger written arbitration agreement50
2.3.2 Respondent questions validity of arbitrator’s appointment as architect’s nal certificate had been issued51
2.3.3 Where conclusiveness of architect’s final certificate time bars arbitration53
2.4 Estoppel54
2.4.1 Party asserts other party estopped from proceeding with arbitration54
2.4.2 Whether a party is estopped by convention from denying the existence of an arbitration clause56
2.5 Existence of57
2.5.1 Contract contains conflicting dispute clauses57
2.5.2 Is there a valid arbitration agreement if the contract is not signed?59
2.5.3 Parties agree to arbitrate in mistaken belief that contract contains an arbitration clause60
2.6 Existing Dispute62
2.6.1 Where prior arbitration agreement may be too restrictive to cover an existing dispute62
2.7 Invalidated by63
2.7.1 Misrepresentation—where asserted options open to arbitrator and parties63
2.7.2 Mistake—is award enforceable where arbitration based on a mistake of fact?65
2.7.3 Illegality—whether illegality invalidates an arbitration clause67
2.8 Need for written68
2.8.1 Contract sealed with wrong company seal68
2.8.2 Contract not signed—incorporated by reference?69
2.8.3 Oral agreement to resolve dispute by arbitration79
2.8.4 What effect an oral agreement made during the reference has on a written arbitration agreement83
2.9 No dispute85
2.9.1 Notice of arbitration given where no dispute exists85
2.10 Time limits88
2.10.1 Extension of time within which to commence arbitration88
2.10.2 Power to the court to extend time prescribed by lease to commence arbitration proceedings95
2.10.3 Whether time is of the essence in the appointment of an arbitrator in a rent review dispute96
2.10.4 Application to appoint an arbitrator outwith the statutory time limit98
2.10.5 Is determination of time limit issue a point of jurisdiction?99
2.10.6 Arbitrator urged to reject an application for an extension of time to serve a statement of claim where the request is made out of time101
2.10.7 Arbitrator has impossibly short period to make award within time limit set down in lease105
2.11 Underlying contract, scope of106
2.11.1 Contract is frustrated; does arbitration clause survive?106
2.11.2 Contract void "ab initio"—severability of arbitration clause107
3 ARBITRATOR113
3.1 Arbitrator or expert113
3.1.1 Where both parties are lay people and unlikely to adduce satisfactory evidence113
3.1.2 Where a tenant wanted an expert not an arbitrator114
3.2 Authority of115
3.2.1 Party questions arbitrator’s authority unilaterally to set date for prelimi-nary meeting115
3.2.2 Arbitrator directs a party to be represented at a meeting of experts116
3.3 Death of118
3.3.1 Arbitrator dies during interlocutory stage118
3.3.2 Arbitrator dies during a long hearing121
3.4 Examination by122
3.4.1 Respondent accuses arbitrator of adopting an inquisitorial role122
3.4.2 When the parties agree that the arbitrator can act inquisitorially126
3.5 Functus officio129
3.5.1 Joint arbitrators disagree and umpire appointed129
3.5.2 Prior disclosure of contents of award to one party131
3.5.3 Losing party telephones arbitrator133
3.6 Independent advice133
3.6.1 Arbitrator decides it necessary to consult a third party133
3.7 Jurisdiction135
3.7.1 Challenge of arbitrator’s jurisdiction at commencement of hearing135
3.7.2 Arbitrators have no power to decide their own jurisdiction137
3.7.3 Threat of injunction against arbitrator on grounds of no jurisdiction139
3.7.4 Dispute in excess of jurisdiction146
3.7.5 Did arbitrator have jurisdiction in dispute under ICE contract when question of reference of that dispute to engineer for his decision is disputed?147
3.7.6 Respondent asserts that the claimant has failed to serve a notice to refer as required by the contract149
3.7.7 Respondent asserts that arbitrator has no jurisdiction due to an oral agreement to refer the dispute to an official referee as arbitrator151
3.7.8 Appointed as arbitrator instead of independent expert153
3.7.9 Whether conduct amounts to a waiver or estoppel of objection to jurisdiction154
3.7.10 The arbitrator has serious doubts about his jurisdiction155
3.7.11 Arbitrator’s jurisdiction limited strictly to terms of arbitration agree-ment152
3.8 Loss of documents158
3.8.1 Loss or destruction of arbitrator’s notes following conclusion of hearing and before award158
3.8.2 Arbitrator’s notes destroyed in car accident during hearing159
3.9 Mistake by161
3.9.1 Arbitrator accused of making a mistake in reasoning161
3.10 Non-impartiality of162
3.10.1 Arbitrator’s personal knowledge of one party162
3.10.2 Arbitrator’s close personal connection with parties’ witnesses164
3.10.3 Party to arbitration seeks to have arbitration award set aside because of arbitrator’s previous professional relationship with other party165
3.10.4 Arbitrator discovers that his partner has previously acted for the claimant167
3.10.5 Arbitrator enquires of health of one party and is accused of bias169
3.10.6 Friend of arbitrator appointed as expert169
3.10.7 Arbitrator accused of bias towards a party’s advocate171
3.11 Note taking172
3.11.1 General guidance172
3.11.2 Shorthand writer unable to take note176
3.12 Own knowledge, use of177
3.12.1 Arbitrator holds contrary view to experts—how far can he use his own knowledge?177
3.12.2 Arbitrator’s personal knowledge of a recent relevant rent agreement180
3.12.3 Where arbitrator’s special knowledge not able to be used183
3.12.4 Arbitrator’s personal knowledge of the facts in dispute184
3.12.5 Caution exercised by an arbitrator in using his own knowledge and experience185
3.12.6 Important to make parties aware of what is in the arbitrator’s mind186
3.12.7 The arbitrator has received written closing submissions but neither party has addressed a legal issue which the arbitrator considers is relevant187
3.12.8 Arbitrator—own knowledge in ex parte hearing188
3.13 Post award involvement191
3.13.1 Successful party claims award does not cover all issues referred to arbitration191
3.14 Powers of192
3.14.1 Can an arbitrator’s decision on an interlocutory matter be challenged successfully?192
3.14.2 Power of an arbitrator to strike out case for want of prosecution194
3.14.3 Consideration to take into account in striking out for want of prosecution198
3.14.4 Respondent applies to arbitrator to strike out the claimant’s claim for want of prosecution202
3.15 Removal of212
3.15.1 Respondent seeks removal of arbitrator on grounds of bias and alleges that the arbitrator ignored a legal point212
3.15.2 Parties wish to remove arbitrator220
Appendix "A"—Model Revocation Agreement224
Appendix "B"—New Agreement225
3.15.3 One party dissatisfied with arbitrator227
3.15.4 Respondent seeks removal of arbitrator on grounds of lack of impar-tiality228
3.15.5 Is arbitrator’s shareholding in company associated with one party a ground for removal for misconduct?230
3.15.6 Arbitrator has connection with one of the parties232
3.16 Resignation234
3.16.1 Arbitrator resigns and parties hold him responsible for costs thrown away234
Appendix "A"—Model Agreement with Arbitrator on his resignation241
3.16.2 Three arbitrator tribunal.Resignation of one arbitrator at beginning of hearing.Is termination of hearing and/or the proceedings inevitable?242
4 AWARD245
4.1 Action on245
4.1.1 What effect has an arbitrator’s award on subsequent High Court proceedings?245
4.1.2 Effectiveness of an award in a "name borrowing" arbitration247
Appendix "A"—Model of a "Name Borrowing" Agreement250
4.2 Appeal from252
4.2.1 Parties rights of appeal from award252
4.2.2 Where court will order further reasons253
4.2.3 Award appealed on ground that the arbitrator failed to state reasons in sufficient detail258
4.3 Consent259
4.3.1 Ensure that terms of settlement in consent award are within arbitrator’s jurisdiction259
Appendix "A"—Typical Consent Award263
4.3.2 Arbitrator requested to countersign consent award the terms of which caused him anxiety265
4.3.3 Arbitrator receives terms of settlement which appear to be ambiguous267
4.3.4 Disagreement as to terms of settlement269
4.3.5 Disagreement between the parties as to whether the dispute has been settled270
4.4 Enforcement270
4.4.1 Following an award in favour of the claimant the respondent goes to ground270
4.4.2 Where award unenforceable without post dispute agreement with "consumer"280
4.4.3 Enforcement of award out of time284
4.5 Errors—in or on the face of285
4.5.1 Generally where an arbitrator can correct errors and where he cannot285
4.5.2 Claimant alleges fact on face of award shows arbitrator to have made an error of computation291
4.5.3 Arbitrator’s interim award fails to deal with two substantive Points of Claim and awards a sum for liquidated and ascertained damages which, by common agreement, is incorrect293
4.5.4 Arbitrator admits inadmissible evidence294
4.5.5 When an error on the face of the award justifies giving leave to appeal295
4.5.6 Power of the arbitrator to correct error in award caused through misunderstanding over offer to settle296
4.5.7 Arbitrator erroneously double-counted an item in making award298
Appendix "A"—Typical Corrective notice300
4.6 Example of301
4.6.1 What form should the award take?301
4.6.2 Arbitrator’s award on disregarding tenant’s improvements in rent review305
4.7 Interim309
4.7.1 Power to make interim award309
4.7.2 Application for interim award in respect of costs of interlocutory proceedings314
4.7.3 Award "Final Save as to Taxation of Costs"317
4.7.4 When an arbitrator should not have published an Interim Award318
4.7.5 Where an interim award may not be Final320
4.8 Reasoned322
4.8.1 What is a reasoned award and when should it be given?322
4.8.2 The arbitrator’s approach to writing a reasoned award326
4.8.3 Unrepresented party not clear whether they want reasons or not330
4.8.4 In a pre-AA ’96 Act reference an unrepresented party requests reasons after award is published333
4.8.5 Party requests retrospective reasons after award335
4.8.6 Request for reasons, not particularised336
4.8.7 Request for "open" reasons337
4.8.8 Where an arbitrator fails to give further reasons even though ordered to do so by the court338
4.8.9 Extent to which reasons should be given for factual findings in a rent review dispute339
4.8.10 When parties do not require a reasoned award340
Appendix "A"—Typical Agreement to dispense with reasons—s.52(1)343
4.9 Remitted343
4.9.1 Award remitted following procedural mishap343
4.9.2 Power of the arbitrator on remission of award345
4.9.3 Is the court’s jurisdiction to remit award under s.22 AA ’50 (s.68(3) AA’96) unlimited?346
4.10 Specific performance349
4.10.1 Arbitrator requested to award specific performance349
4.11 Timing of351
4.11.1 Arbitrator’s award in danger of being published after statutory time limit351
4.11.2 Where an arbitrator takes an inordinate time to make his award following the conclusion of the hearing352
4.12 Weighing the evidence355
4.12.1 How to weight the evidence when drafting an award355
5 CAUSE OF ACTION363
5.1 Accrual of363
5.1.1 Dispute between parties concerning accrual of cause of action363
5.2 Replaced by award366
5.2.1 When the cause of action is widened after reference and subsequently replaced by award366
6 CLAIM DEFENCE AND COUNTERCLAIM373
6.1 Claim—hopeless373
6.1.1 Points of claim indicate a hopeless case373
6.1.2 Claimant submits what may be a spurious claim376
6.2 Defence—hopeless377
6.2.1 It becomes apparent at preliminary meeting that respondent has very poor defence377
6.3 Counterclaim—right to mount380
6.3.1 Impoverished respondent seeks to mount counterclaim380
7 COMMON LAW ARBITRATIONS383
7.1 Common Law Arbitrations383
7.1.1 Arbitration clause incorporated by reference averred to be invalid383
7.1.2 Arbitrator requested to make a peremptory order385
7.1.3 One party seeks to revoke the arbitrator’s appointment387
8 CONTRACT389
8.1 Is there a written?389
8.1.1 Doubt raised as to whether a written contract exists or not389
Appendix "A"—Typical "ad hoc" written arbitration agreement391
8.2 Existence of392
8.2.1 Dispute as to the existence of a contract392
8.3 Not signed394
8.3.1 Work executed under contract not signed394
8.4 Wrong, cited in pleadings395
8.4.1 Appointment made under one contract but Points of Claim refer to a different contract395
9 COSTS397
9.1 Generally397
9.1.1 Award does not cover costs397
9.1.2 Arbitrator must act judicially in deciding costs398
9.1.3 Where one party alleges that the arbitrator has not excercised his discretion judicially in dealing with costs400
9.1.4 Parties fail to address the arbitrator on costs before close of hearing401
9.1.5 Who should get costs if a Point of Claim is withdrawn before hearing commences?402
9.2 Power to deal with403
9.2.1 Where does the arbitrator’s power come from?403
9.2.2 Parties request arbitrator to give an informal indication on costs405
9.2.3 Where one party wishes to defer determination of costs406
9.3 What costs?407
9.3.1 Costs of the reference and costs of the award407
9.3.2 How to deal with court costs in arbitration409
9.3.3 Can an arbitrator deal with the court costs of determining a preliminary point of law410
9.3.4 Application for costs of matters pleaded and subsequently admitted411
9.4 Follow the event413
9.4.1 What is the event?413
9.4.2 Identity of the successful party416
9.5 Unusual award as to419
9.5.1 When the arbitrator is minded to depart from the usual rule of "costs follow the event"419
9.5.2 Claimant awarded part of claim but directed to bear own costs and pay substantial element of the respondent’s costs.421
9.5.3 When costs do not "follow the event"424
9.6 Interlocutory directions426
9.6.1 Generally426
9.6.2 Why an arbitrator should not link a cost order to the right to serve a pleading429
9.6.3 What happens to interlocutory costs orders when an award is appealed?434
9.6.4 When interlocutory costs are paid in any event by the party who is subsequently successful in the action and is awarded costs435
9.7 Costs—of a lay representative437
9.7.1 Power to award costs of party where represented by a non-practising lawyer or other unqualified person437
9.8 Agreement between the parties as to costs440
9.8.1 Whether an agreement between the parties that they bear their own costs is valid440
9.8.2 Claimant who accepts the respondent’s offer to settle in the terms of an agreed settlement subsequently applies to the arbitrator for an order for costs443
9.8.3 Parties agree settlement terms but fail to include arbitrator’s fee444
9.9 Where there is a counterclaim445
9.9.1 What now is the event?445
9.9.2 Costs where the claimant wins the claim but loses the counterclaim447
9.10 Where there are offers to settle448
9.10.1 The effect of a "sealed offer" on costs448
9.10.2 Rent review costs, close Calderbank offers, discretion acting judicially450
9.10.3 The effect of a change of pleadings upon an offer to settle456
9.10.4 The reasonableness of refusing an offer in a multi-party action458
9.10.5 Offers where there is a claim and a counterclaim460
9.10.6 Where there is an offer and a counter-offer461
9.10.7 Relevance of offer, counter-offer and withdrawal of offer in exercising discretion as to costs462
9.10.8 Where doubt exists over the event for which both a sealed and an "open" offer received464
9.11 Applications to court466
9.11.1 How binding is a party’s standard terms to limit his costs?466
9.11.2 The arbitrator fails to make an award as to costs467
9.11.3 Appeal against an unusual award as to costs469
9.11.4 How the court can assist where one party claims that the arbitrator’s fees appear to be excessive470
9.11.5 Arbitrator refuses to deliver award until fees are paid473
9.12 Security for the parties’ costs474
9.12.1 Power of arbitrator to order security for costs474
Appendix "A"—Typical "ad hoc" Arbitration Agreement481
9.12.2 What factors should an arbitrator take into account when deciding whether or not to exercise his discretion to order security for a party’s costs?482
9.12.3 Security for costs in a "documents only" arbitration488
9.12.4 Security for costs under rules489
9.12.5 The procedure the arbitrator should follow in dealing with security for parties’ costs491
Appendix "A"—Typical direction for procedure for dealing with security for costs application494
9.12.6 The claimant fails to comply with the arbitrator’s direction for affidavit evidence496
9.12.7 The criteria the arbitrator should apply in deciding whether to order security and, if so, how much and in what form?497
Appendix "A"—Typical direction ordering security for costs509
9.12.8 The respondent makes an application to increase security previously ordered511
Appendix "A"—Typical direction ordering an increase in security for costs previously awarded513
9.12.9 How to deal with a security for costs application where either party could be the claimaint514
9.12.10 Can an arbitrator consider sealed offers when considering a security for costs application?515
9.12.11 Where a party fails to comply with an arbitrator’s order for security515
9.12.12 When the costs of a security for costs application might not "follow the event"517
9.12.13 What to do with money put up as security for costs518
9.13 Recoverable costs519
9.13.1 Arbitrator asked to exercise power to cap costs519
Appendix "A"—Typical order for directions for limiting the parties’ recoverable costs—s.65 AA ’96527
9.13.2 An arbitrator decides to exercise his discretion to tax the parties’ costs528
9.13.3 Parties cannot agree on the form of Bill for arbitrator’s settlement of costs530
Appendix "A"—Typical direction for Settlement of Costs532
9.13.4 Procedure to follow where arbitrator to tax the parties’ costs534
9.13.5 Procedure to follow where arbitrator is to determine the parties’ recoverable costs544
10 DAMAGES553
10.1 Assessment of553
10.1.1 Generally553
10.1.2 How to decide when a party is liable for damages557
Appendix "A"—Flow chart showing how to analyse a Point of Claim or counterclaim561
10.1.3 Where damages assessed on same basis in contract as in tort562
10.1.4 Damages claimed for defective work executed some years before567
10.1.5 Measure of damages where there is a third party settlement568
10.2 Quantum of569
10.2.1 Liquidated damages linked to sectional completion and whether notice is a condition precedent to deducting them569
10.2.2 When employer wrongfully repudiates contract577
10.2.3 Loss and expense claims clarified580
10.3 For distress and inconvenience586
10.3.1 Power to award general damages in building cases586
11 DECLARATORY RELIEF595
11.1 Arbitrator’s power to award595
11.1.1 Arbitrator’s power to make a declaratory award595
12 DIRECTIONS599
12.1 General599
12.1.1 The arbitrator’s power to give directions599
12.1.2 Typical direction concerning the preliminary meeting601
Appendix "A"—Typical letter to parties re appointment and checklist for preliminary meeting602
Appendix "B"—Typical Order for directions confirming date,time and venue for Preliminary Meeting606
Appendix "C"—Typical agenda for a preliminary meeting under JCT Arbi-tration Rules607
Appendix "D"—Typical Direction following preliminary meeting—JCT Arbi-tration Rules616
12.2 Interlocutory624
12.2.1 Extending time for service of party’s statement624
Appendix "A"—Direction extending time for service of statement627
12.2.2 Amendment of a party’s statement628
Appendix "A"—Direction consenting to request to amend pleadings629
12.2.3 Notice under the Civil Evidence Act 1995630
Appendix "A"—Typical direction covering notice under the Civil Evidence Act 1995632
12.2.4 When a pre-hearing review should be held633
Appendix "A"—Typical Direction convening a pre-hearing review meeting635
Appendix "B"—Typical agenda for pre-hearing review meeting636
Appendix "C"—Typical Direction following pre-hearing review meeting—post AA ’96638
12.2.5 Arbitrator not bound to give reasons for interlocutory directions and court cannot review or revise them641
12.2.6 Arbitrator not obliged to give reason for interlocutory decisions but does so voluntarily642
12.2.7 Loss and expense claim in construction contract—when and to what extent should the arbitrator order fully particularised details of his claim?644
12.3 Arbitrator’s, non-compliance with647
12.3.1 Generally647
12.3.2 Failure to serve claim as directed652
Appendix "A"—Peremptory Order following failure to serve a statement of case654
12.3.3 Failure to serve Defence as directed655
12.3.4 Failure by a party to reply to a request for Further and Better Particulars655
Appendix "A"—Typical Direction following failure to comply with a request for Further and Better Particulars657
12.3.5 Failure of party to comply with Direction for Specific Discovery659
Appendix "A"—Typical Peremptory Order for Specific Discovery661
12.3.6 Unless Order re failure to serve witness statements662
Appendix "A"—Typical Unless Order following failure to serve witness statements663
12.3.7 Respondent refuses to waste his time defending a sham claim664
Appendix "A"—Typical Direction warning of possible ex parte hearing666
12.4 Amendment of668
12.4.1 Application to amend an arbitrators direction which was made without prior discussion with the parties668
13 DOCUMENTS669
13.1 Authenticity distinguished from admissibility669
13.1.1 How to determine authenticity of possibly admissible evidence669
13.2 Discovery of670
13.2.1 Restricted discovery during determination of preliminary issue670
13.2.2 Request by parties for early discovery671
13.2.3 In a large and complex case claimant requested the arbitrator to order the respondent to swear an affidavit that all relevant papers had been discovered672
13.2.4 Unreasonably wide request for discovery674
13.2.5 Arbitrator takes independent legal advice on order for discoverY675
Appendix "A"—Typical Order for Directions for Discovery of Documents677
13.2.6 Specific Discovery678
Appendix "A"—Typical Order for Directions for Specific Discovery681
13.2.7 Very late request for further discovery683
13.2.8 Application for discovery during the course of the hearing684
13.2.9 Court no longer has power to order discovery in arbitration685
13.2.10 How far does discovery need to go on computer disks?686
13.2.11 The extent to which discovery should be ordered by the arbitrator687
13.2.12 The restriction on documents obtained in discovery688
13.2.13 Does a party have to disclose all copies of a particular document following an order for discovery689
13.3 Inspection of690
13.3.1 Documents destroyed, therefore not available for inspection690
13.4 Only691
13.4.1 Arbitrator requires further submissions in order to determine the dispute691
13.4.2 Privileged document accidentally included and essential document omitted691
13.4.3 A brief preliminary meeting with the parties in "documents only" arbitration sometimes bears fruit693
Appendix "A"—Typical request for written answers to questions696
13.4.4 Whether an arbitrator should admit a further submission after close of Pleadings?697
13.4.5 How to react to a third party’s attempted interference with a reference697
13.4.6 Where documents contain a claim which arises following the application to refer699
13.4.7 Where burden of proof can shift to the respondent700
13.4.8 Where a similar fact evidence might be admissible in a "documents only" arbitration702
13.4.9 Following an award the unrepresented claimant accuses the arbitrator of failing to note crucial evidence703
13.4.10 Should an arbitrator order a claimant to provide security for costs in a "documents only" reference?705
13.4.11 When an arbitrator had to seek counsel’s opinion on how far he could go in seeking clarification of a party’s statement in a "documents only" arbitration705
13.4.12 Where it is desirable, or necessary, to switch from a "documents only" procedure to an oral hearing711
13.4.13 Model Award711
Appendix "A" Model Award713
13.5 Production of717
13.5.1 Introduction at hearing of documents not previously referred to717
13.6 Reading of718
13.6.1 Extent to which the arbitrator should read the hearing bundle718
13.7 Statements in719
13.7.1 Arbitrator received confidential document from claimant complaining of respondent719
14 EVIDENCE721
14.1 Admissibility of721
14.1.1 Generally—Arbitrator must admit all admissible evidence721
14.1.2 Is evidence from another unrelated dispute admissible in the subject dispute?724
14.1.3 Where the maker of a statement which a party wishes to put in evidence has to be called, even if no formal notice given by the opposing party728
14.1.4 Power of arbitrator to limit admissible evidence730
14.1.5 Admissibility of unsigned witness statements where party evinces an intention of taking no further part in the proceedings732
14.1.6 Admissibility of documents inadvertently missed in discovery734
14.1.7 The effect of s.34(2)(f) AA ’96 (Evidence—admissibility, relevance and weight) in rent review arbitrations735
14.2 Estoppel737
14.2.1 Cause of action estoppel defence may not always apply737
14.2.2 Whether issue estoppel can be successfully pleaded738
14.2.3 A party seeks to estop the other party from re-opening, with the arbitrator, an issue on which he asserts previous agreement was reached741
14.3 Expert742
14.3.1 Generally742
14.3.2 One party appoints an expert, the other party fails to do so756
14.3.3 Expert appointed by the arbitrator759
Appendix "A"—Standard direction on expert evidence763
14.3.4 Using a second expert witness764
14.3.5 Admissibility of expert evidence765
14.3.6 Whether the arbitrator has power to order the disclosure of an expert’s report767
14.3.7 Expert witness dies just before the hearing770
14.3.8 Distinguishing between evidence of witnesses of fact and expert witnesses772
14.3.9 Expert evidence in complete contradiction773
14.3.10 Expert witnesses unable to agree on any matters of fact in dispute776
14.3.11 Neither expert’s evidence preferred by the arbitrator779
14.3.12 Party prompts own expert while giving evidence780
14.3.13 Problem of hearing expert evidence on lengthy Scott Schedule781
14.3.14 The respondent makes an application during the hearing to have his key witness of fact called as an expert782
14.3.15 An ex-employee wishes to appear as an expert witness for the party who previously employed him784
14.3.16 Expert did not produce his own backup material785
14.3.17 Expert deviates from his report and argues merits of his party’s case787
14.3.18 Expert omits to deal with material facts789
14.3.19 Determination—taxation of incompetent expert’s costs790
14.3.20 Expert is clearly partisan791
14.3.21 Expert evidence contradicts evidence that the expert gave in a previous arbitration795
14.3.22 An expert includes evidence in his report from another expert796
14.3.23 The tribunal appointed expert798
Appendix "A"—Typical alternative agenda items for the option of a tribunal appointed expert802
14.4 Fresh803
14.4.1 Arbitrator’s failure to consider fresh evidence before publishing award in "documents only" reference803
14.4.2 Party attempts to admit fresh evidence after conclusion of hearing but before award805
14.4.3 Party submits fresh evidence to the arbitrator after publication of his nal award806
14.4.4 Party no opportunity of making submission to arbitrator on fresh evidence after hearing the facts807
14.4.5 After granting an adjournment request to the claimant to seek legal advice on a fresh point, the claimant fails to make any further written submissions809
14.5 Hearing810
14.5.1 A key witness who cannot be available for the hearing seeks to give evidence to the arbitrator in the absence of the other party810
14.5.2 Arbitrator receives evidence in absence of both parties812
14.5.3 Arbitrator determines dispute without hearing either party812
14.5.4 The admissibility of documents into an "ex parte" hearing not previously discovered813
14.5.5 Witness’s evidence varies from his written proof814
14.6 Hearsay815
14.6.1 Generally, What is hearsay evidence?815
14.6.2 Hearsay evidence is now, prima facie, admissible unless parties agree that the strict rules of evidence are to apply817
14.6.3 Claimant requests consent to refer to a letter rather than calling the writer821
14.7 Privilege821
14.7.1 A claim of legal professional privilege821
14.7.2 Litigation privilege and non-practising legally qualified advisers823
14.7.3 What "privilege" can be claimed by non-legally qualified advisers?826
14.7.4 Privilege in rent review arbitrations829
14.7.5 Privileged material referred to at a preliminary meeting832
14.7.6 Refusal to disclose confidential documents833
14.7.7 Argument adduced at hearing from a privileged document835
14.7.8 Where a "without prejudice" offer may not be privileged836
14.7.9 Deliberate disclosure of a "without prejudice" letter to the arbitrator?837
14.7.10 Public interest claimed as privilege841
14.8 Proofs of844
14.8.1 Party’s counsel objects to exchange of proofs of evidence844
14.8.2 How exchanged statements of witnesses of fact may be used at a hearing845
14.8.3 Parties ordered to exchange witnesses’ proofs of evidence; one party fails to do so847
Appendix "A"—Unless Order—Order for Directions849
14.8.4 Parties ordered to exchange witnesses’ proofs of evidence.One party fails to do so, even after threat of debarment850
Appendix "A"—Unless Order—Order for Directions No 19853
14.9 Relevant854
14.9.1 Distinction between relevance and weight854
14.9.2 Claimant fails to deal with what the arbitrator considers is relevant point855
14.9.3 Counsel questions relevance of tenant’s accounts in rent review dispute856
14.10 Similar fact859
14.10.1 Application for discovery of similar fact evidence859
15 EXPERT DETERMINATION863
15.1 Expert determination863
1.1 Whether person is appointed as an arbitrator or an independent expert?863
1.2 When can a determination by an expert be successfully challenged?865
1.3 Independent expert or arbitrator?867
1.4 The independent expert not bound to act judicially869
1.5 Determination in the absence of a dispute871
1.6 Can an independent expert unilaterally decide to determine a preliminary issue?872
1.7 Should an independent expert give reasons for his determination?872
16 FEES875
16.1 Generally875
16.1.1 Generally875
Appendix "A"—Arbitrator’s Terms888
Appendix "B"—Time Sheet890
Appendix "B"—Expense Sheet891
Appendix "C"—Typical Fee Statement892
16.2 Non agreement of895
16.2.1 One party agrees to arbitrator’s fees, the other does not895
16.2.2 Neither party responds to arbitrator’s request to sign terms; the arbitrator subsequently seeks a commitment fee897
16.2.3 Party considers arbitrator’s fees too high899
16.2.4 Fees—How does the party with liability to pay the Arbitrator’s Fees challenge the amount of such fees when they have already been paid by the other party?901
16.3 Non payment of903
16.3.1 Parties agree arbitrator’s terms at preliminary meeting but fail to return them signed.They also fail to pay interim fees subsequently requested903
16.3.2 Cheque for interim fees is not honoured911
16.3.3 A hearing becomes protracted and runs considerably over the time set aside by the arbitrator; consequently he finds himself considerably exposed for fees outstanding which he may not recover for several months912
16.3.4 Payment of arbitrator’s out-of-pocket expenses915
16.3.5 One party offers to pay half of the arbitrator’s fees only on collection of award916
16.3.6 Arbitrator publishes award and parties do not collect918
16.3.7 Parties settle, but make no agreement concerning the arbitrator’s fees and neither accepts liability for them919
Appendix "A"—Typical points of claim923
16.4 Arbitrators, security for927
16.4.1 Generally927
16.4.2 Failure by one or both parties to comply with a direction of the arbitrator to provide security for his fees and expenses931
Appendix "A"—Typical Direction for procedure for dealing with the arbi-trator’s security for costs933
Appendix "B"—Typical Peremptory Order following failure to provide security when directed935
16.4.3 What to do with a substantial sum lodged with the arbitrator as security for his costs936
16.4.4 Arbitrator, anticipating ex parte hearing, sets level of security for his fees and expenses.Respondent unexpectedly turns up.Claimant insists that respondent be directed to pay a moiety of the security937
16.4.5 Hearing adjourned on application of respondent.Under circumstances,claimant asks arbitrator to direct that respondent put up some security for arbitrator’s fees and expenses—all previously provided by the claimant.Arbitrator so directs.Respondent does not comply938
16.4.6 Security for arbitrator’s fees after company put into liquidation939
17 HEARING941
17.1 Adjournment of941
17.1.1 Parties jointly request adjournment of hearing941
17.1.2 A hearing is set and one or both parties fail to turn up942
17.1.3 Adjournment requested to consider supplementary expert’s report943
17.2 Agreed bundle944
17.2.1 No agreed bundle delivered to the arbitrator944
17.2.2 Parties fail to prepare agreed bundle and produce their own946
17.3 Evidence947
17.3.1 When relaxation of strict rules of evidence is permissible947
17.3.2 Counsel constantly objects to leading questions949
17.4 Interventions950
17.4.1 Arbitrator stops counsel after long-winded submission950
17.4.2 When it is permissible for an arbitrator to interrupt counsel952
17.4.3 Arbitrator interrupts counsel indicating his acceptance of point being made954
17.5 Order of956
17.5.1 Respondent seeks to interpose his expert earlier into the hearing956
17.6 Party’s right to be present throughout957
17.6.1 Respondent consistently rude to the arbitrator957
17.6.2 Arbitrator excludes objectionable party959
17.7 Postponement of960
17.7.1 Postponement requested due to non-availability of Counsel960
17.7.2 Respondent wishes to postpone start of hearing961
17.8 Presence of a stranger963
17.8.1 Attendance of person not involved in dispute963
17.8.2 Confidentiality of arbitral proceedings964
17.9 Right to have968
17.9.1 One party wants to have oral hearing the other wants "documents only"968
17.10 Speed of progress at969
17.10.1 Arbitrator controls speed of progress at hearing969
17.11 Unequal representation at970
17.11.1 Unequal representation at hearing970
18 INJUNCTION973
18.1 Arbitrator’s power to grant973
18.1.1 Employer requests the arbitrator to grant an interim injunction against an obstructive contractor973
18.1.2 Power of the court975
19 INSPECTION977
19.1 Arbitrator’s power to order977
19.1.1 Whether arbitrator has power to order inspection of property which is the subject of the reference977
19.1.2 Arbitrator wishes to inspect a model of the property which is the subject of the reference978
19.1.3 When an arbitrator should inspect the property subject of the dispute980
19.2 Difficulties arising from982
19.2.1 Requirement to inspect frustrated by claimant982
19.2.2 One party requests arbitrator to inspect property: the other party objects so the arbitrator offers to use the visit to take evidence983
19.2.3 Respondent ignores all arbitrator’s directions and subsequently denies access for arbitrator’s inspection984
19.3 Rights of parties at985
19.3.1 The rights of parties at an inspection compared with rights at the hearing itself985
20 INTEREST989
20.1 General and special damages989
20.1.1 Whether the arbitrator has power to award interest by way of general damages for late payment of debt989
20.2 Special damages997
20.2.1 Interest incurred as a direct loss and/or expense or as special damages997
20.3 Discretion under AA ’96999
20.3.1 How s.49 AA ’96 has changed the arbitrator’s discretion to award interest under s.19A AA ’50999
20.3.2 Whether there is a contrict between the arbitrator’s discretion under s.49 AA ’96 and a contractual right to interest?1005
20.4 Finance charges1006
20.4.1 Whether finance charges are a recoverable head of damage in a claim for direct loss and/or expense and whether such can be validly claimed on a compound interest basis1006
20.5 Sums due and unpaid, on1009
20.5.1 Whether the arbitrator has power to award interest on sums paid late but before the arbitration commences1009
20.5.2 Whether the arbitrator has power to award interest on sums found by him to be under-certified1010
20.5.3 The distinction between mere counterclaims and counterclaims which also constitute defences of abatement or set off1013
20.6 Not pleaded1016
20.6.1 Neither party claims interest1016
20.7 Where there is an offer to settle1017
20.7.1 Where interest can have a significant effect1017
21 SERIOUS IRREGULARITY1019
21.1 Serious irregularity—misconduct1019
21.1.1 Generally1019
21.1.2 Thomasina researches cases of "Misconduct"1025
21.1.3 Cases of "Misconduct" in Construction Cases1030
21.1.4 Cases of "Misconduct" in Rent Review Cases1039
21.2 Serious irregularity—failure by the tribunal to comply with s.33 and resulting in s.24 sanctions1042
21.2.1 Failure to disclose documents to both sides; admissibility of evidence1042
21.2.2 Whether to refuse adjournment could be said to be not properly conducting the proceedings1046
21.2.3 Arbitrator comes to view contrary to evidence adduced before him1047
21.2.4 Arbitrator fails to deal with interest; is this a serious irregularity?1048
21.2.5 When an injudicious remark of the arbitrator can amount to misconduct1049
21.3 Serious irregularity—challenging the award1050
21.3.1 Failure by the tribunal to comply with s.33 (general duty of tribunal) (s.68(2)(a))1050
21.3.2 Arbitrator exceeds his powers by giving order for general discovery when the rules permit only specific discovery (s.68(2)(b))1056
21.3.3 Failure by the arbitrator to conduct the proceedings in accordance with the procedure agreed by the parties (s.68(2)(c))1057
21.3.4 Failure by the tribunal to deal with all the issues that were put to it (s.68(2)(d))1059
21.3.5 Uncertainty or ambiguity as to the effect of the award (s.68(2)(f))1060
21.3.6 An award is obtained by fraud (s.68(2)(g))1061
21.3.7 An award is made without being dated or stating the seat of the arbitration in contravention to s.68(2)(h) AA ’961062
21.3.8 An arbitrator admits to an irregularity in the award (s.68(2)(i) AA ’96)1062
21.4 Misconduct—immunity from suit1063
21.4.1 Of the arbitrator1063
21.4.2 Of the Appointing Body1067
22 OATH1073
22.1 Taking of1073
22.1.1 Difficulty arises at hearing over form of sacred book1073
22.1.2 Witness privately prompted by his advocate whilst still under oath1075
22.1.3 Witness clearly lying under oath1076
23 OFFER TO SETTLE1079
23.1 Open1079
23.1.1 Arbitrator sent a copy of an "open" offer1079
23.1.2 Should an open offer attract interest?1080
23.2 Sealed1080
23.2.1 Arbitrator asks parties if a sealed offer has been made1080
23.2.2 Existence of "secret" offer disclosed to arbitrator1081
23.2.3 Failure to disclose the existence of a sealed offer before award1083
23.3 Treatment of costs when1085
23.3.1 When the sealed offer exceeds the net amount awarded1085
23.4 Without prejudice1087
23.4.1 Disclosure of "without prejudice" offer1087
23.4.2 Arbitrator sent a copy of a "without prejudice" offer1089
24 PARTIES1091
24.1 Assignment of claim1091
24.1.1 Receiver of claimant company assigns to a third party right to arbitrate a dispute1091
24.2 Bankruptcy of1092
24.2.1 Party is put into bankruptcy during arbitration1092
24.3 Death of1094
24.3.1 Party dies during reference1094
24.4 Disputes as to1098
24.4.1 When the claimant believes that there are joint respondents and the respondent avers that there is a third party to the contract which the claimant denies1098
24.5 Illness of1102
24.5.1 Party requests indefinite deferment due to illness1102
24.6 Liquidation of1103
24.6.1 Power of arbitrator to proceed when party put into compulsory liquidation1103
24.6.2 Party in liquidation; original assignor’s right to arbitration1104
24.6.3 Claimant goes into creditors’ voluntary liquidation during reference1105
24.7 Loss of confidence in arbitrator1107
24.7.1 During a hearing a party loses confidence in ability of the arbitrator to grasp satisfactorily the problems being arbitrated1107
24.8 Personal contacts with1108
24.8.1 Arbitrator found to have regular contact with one party1108
24.9 Receivership, in1110
24.9.1 Party put into receivership during arbitration1110
24.10 Reluctant respondent1111
24.10.1 Respondent fails to acknowledge arbitrator’s letters1111
24.10.2 Respondent persistently fails to comply with arbitrator’s directions1115
24.10.3 Respondent engaged in delaying tactics1115
24.11 In repudiatory breach1117
24.11.1 When a respondent seeks a declaration that the claimant has repudi-ated the Arbitration Agreement1117
24.12 Impecuniosity of1119
24.12.1 The respondent (counter-claimant) admits to being totally out of funds1119
24.13 Role reversal1120
24.13.1 Respondent becomes claimant1120
24.13.2 Tenant avers that he, not the landlord, should be the claimant1121
24.14 Written Agreement, of1121
24.14.1 One party attempts to resile from an earlier agreement1121
25 POINTS OF LAW1125
25.1 Preliminary issue on1125
25.1.1 Preliminary issue of point of law1125
25.1.2 Party asks arbitrator to apply to the High Court to determine point of law1130
25.1.3 Arbitrator faces difficult legal argument1131
25.1.4 Where an arbitrator may be aware of legal authority not cited by either side1133
25.1.5 Duty of counsel when a difficult point of law arises1133
25.1.6 Where no authority cited in support of legal contentions1135
25.1.7 Landlord avers a typing error in the notice of review, which the tenant has signed and returned1136
25.1.8 Differing interpretations arise out of a rent review clause1138
25.1.9 Arbitrator to assess level of rent on review for full repairing and insuring lease subject to schedule of conditions left blank1139
26 PLEADINGS1141
26.1 Statements of claim and defence1141
26.1.1 Formal pleadings or statement of case?1141
26.2 Amendment of1146
26.2.1 Generally1146
Appendix "A"—Typical Order for Directions granting an application to amend Pleadings1150
26.2.2 Late amendment of pleading necessary to include counterclaim1152
26.2.3 Claimant requests amendment of pleadings during hearing1153
26.2.4 Late request to cover continuing loss of pleaded item1155
26.3 Fraud in1157
26.3.1 Suggestion of fraud in pleadings1157
26.4 Further and better particulars1158
26.4.1 Generally1158
Appendix "A"—Typical requests for Further and Better Particulars of defence and counterclaim1162
Appendix "B"—Unless order in respect of failure to reply to Further and Better Particulars1164
26.4.2 How to deal with requests for Particulars to which the asking party declines to reply1166
26.5 Late service of1167
26.5.1 Extending the timetable for service of pleadings1167
26.6 Not properly particularised1168
26.6.1 Claim in pleadings in "global" terms1168
26.6.2 Arbitrator directs how inadequate pleadings should be remedied1173
26.6.3 Questions put to the parties1175
Appendix "A"—Typical Order re Notice to Admit Facts1179
Appendix "B"—Re typical request for Interrogatories (Questions from the arbitrator)1180
26.7 Re-service of1181
26.7.1 Party’s newly appointed solicitor requests consent to Re-Serve Defence and Counterclaim previously inadequately served by lay representative1181
Appendix "A"—Typical Direction granting the respondents application to re-serve its defence1184
Appendix "B"—Typical Direction seven-day notice to respondent re failure to serve defence1186
26.8 Without prejudice1187
26.8.1 Pleadings alleged to be "without prejudice"1187
27 PROCEEDINGS1189
27.1 Abandonment of reference1189
27.1.1 Absentee respondent, working and resident overseas, refuses to appoint representative.Claimant elects to start arbitration proceedings and subsequently claims abandonment1189
27.2 Conduct of1191
27.2.1 How the Arbitration Act 1996 has changed the approach of the parties and the arbitrator1191
27.2.2 The parties rule—O.K.!1197
27.2.3 Parties actively co-operate with the arbitrator in devising a cost-effective procedure to resolve this dispute1206
27.2.4 Consideration of the most cost effective procedure1208
27.2.5 The preliminary meeting and beyond1216
27.2.6 Parties disagree on form of proceedings1220
27.2.7 Requirement to follow agreed procedure1223
27.2.8 Doing something contrary to the parties’ expectations in a written representations rent review procedure1224
Appendix "A"—Typical opening letter to the parties1226
Appendix "B"—Typical follow up letter1228
Appendix "C"—Typical preliminary meeting agenda1229
Appendix "D"—Order for directions on documents only with or without a preliminary meeting1231
27.2.9 Wot, no preliminary meeting?1234
Appendix "A"—Typical letter to lay parties where arbitrator decides to dispense with preliminary meeting1236
Appendix "A"—List of matters which need to be covered by my directions to the parties1239
Appendix "B"—Typical abbreviated terms for a simple dispute with lay parties1240
27.3 Equitable determinations1242
27.3.1 Parties consider effect of adopting an equity clause1242
27.4 Exclusion agreements, entering into1248
27.4.1 Party queries effect of entering into an exclusion agreement1248
Appendix "A"—Typical Agreement to exclude the jurisdiction of the court ss.45(1) and 69(1)1252
27.4.2 Party asks if exclusion agreement applies to interim award1253
27.5 "Ex parte"1254
27.5.1 Generally—when may an arbitrator proceed "ex parte" and what principles should he observe?1254
27.5.2 Respondent fails to communicate with arbitrator following withdrawal of instructions from solicitor1258
27.5.3 The reluctant respondent’s bluff is called1260
27.5.4 The respondent appears, without warning, on the first day of the hearing1262
27.5.5 The respondent says he will not attend the hearing due to insufficient time to prepare1263
27.5.6 Respondent fails to appear at the hearing.The claimant attempts to introduce evidence in his absence1265
27.5.7 Dealing with a counterclaim and costs at an "ex parte" hearing1266
27.6 Proceedings—multi-party arbitrations1267
27.6.1 The employer seeks to commence an arbitration against a nominated subcontractor and against the main contractor in the same action1267
27.6.2 Application made to consolidate two arbitrations1268
27.6.3 The arbitrator’s power to consolidate or order concurrent hearings in related disputes1274
27.6.4 What alteration is necessary to normal procedures when joinder provisions are invoked?1281
Appendix "A"—Extract from typical Direction in joinder cases1284
27.6.5 When a subcontractor with a genuine dispute may find himself involved in an arbitration under the main contract and have to wait for years to receive his just entitlement1286
27.6.6 Difficulties and costs where separate arbitration clauses in related contacts1287
27.7 Stay of, overlap with litigation1288
27.7.1 Limitations of arbitrator’s consideration of overlapping issues when arbitration and litigation proceed in parallel1288
27.7.2 Concurrent proceedings—inter-relationship with court proceedings1292
27.7.3 Whether a court action should be stayed where a writ is issued as a pre-emptive strike before arbitration proceedings can begin?1296
27.7.4 When a step taken in litigation may justify a stay of arbitration proceedings1297
27.7.5 Refusal to operate an Arbitration Agreement—can a party go to court?1298
27.8 Substantive and procedural law1300
27.8.1 Arbitrator asked to rule on the proper law of the contract and what rules should apply to access to witnesses1300
28 PROPERTY1305
28.1 Subject of Reference1305
28.1.1 Claimant makes application to the arbitrator to release property,retained by the respondent, which is subject of the reference1305
28.1.2 Respondent threatens to sell goods which are the subject of the reference1307
29 RECTIFICATION1311
29.1 Contract, of1311
29.1.1 Power of arbitrator to deal with rectification of the contract1311
29.1.2 Power of arbitrator to order damages resulting from rectification of contract1313
30 REPRESENTATION1315
30.1 Party in Person, Assistance of1315
30.1.1 Right of party appearing in person to have assistance of a McKenzie friend1315
30.1.2 Extent to which the arbitrator assists an unrepresented party1316
30.2 Poor Quality1317
30.2.1 Counsel presenting case in incompetent fashion1317
30.2.2 Parties’ representatives have little or no idea of arbitration procedure1318
30.3 Legal1319
30.3.1 "Fit for Counsel"1319
Appendix "A"—Typical extract from Order for Directions1323
30.3.2 Solicitor withdraws before the hearing1324
30.3.3 Counsel appears at hearing without warning1324
31 SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE1327
31.1 Interim award for1327
31.1.1 Claimant seeks order for specific performance from unique specialist contractor1327
32 SUBMISSIONS1331
32.1 Closing1331
32.1.1 Advocate’s closing submissions1331
32.2 Copied to both sides1334
32.2.1 Documents received by arbitrator not sent to other side1334
32.3 Opening1335
32.3.1 Counsel’s opening submissions1335
33 VALUE ADDED TAX1339
33.1 Value added tax1339
33.1.1 Generally1339
33.1.2 The VAT position when a party settles1345
Appendix "A"—Agreed Minutes of Meeting between HM Customs and Excise (VAT Office) and Law Society—23 October 19911350
33.1.3 The treatment of VAT and damages and "offers" to settle1354
34 WITNESSES1357
34.1 Appearing for both sides1357
34.1.1 Both parties wish to call same witness1357
34.2 Compellability to give evidence1358
34.2.1 Generally1358
34.2.2 Witness called by claimant refuses to attend hearing.Respondent alleges that this witness is central to his case1361
34.3 Illness of1362
34.3.1 Persistent interruptions to hearing through witness’s incapacity1362
34.4 Leading questions and prompting witness1363
34.4.1 When leading questions should be allowed and when prompting a witness is unacceptable1363
34.5 Hostile/objectionable behaviour1364
34.5.1 When a witness’s behaviour in giving evidence becomes unacceptable1364
34.6 Order of1366
34.6.1 Counsel requests that expert be called before witnesses of fact1366
34.7 Perjury, committed by1367
34.7.1 Witness clearly lying under oath and solicitors’ duty to ensure the truth of witness statements1367
34.8 Proof of evidence1368
34.8.1 Generally1368
34.9 Question, refusal to answer1371
34.9.1 Witness who previously agreed to give evidence now refuses to do so1371
35 APPEALS TO COURT1373
35.1 Power of court to extend time for beginning arbitral proceedings1373
35.1.1 Generally1373
35.2 Determination of preliminary point of jurisdiction1375
35.2.1 Generally1375
35.2.2 Challenging an arbitrator’s jurisdiction—ss.32 and 73 AA ’961377
35.3 Challenging the award jurisdiction1378
35.3.1 Generally1378
35.3.2 Arbitrator awards a longer extension of time than is asked for—s.68(1) and (2) AA ’961381
35.4 Determination of preliminary point of law1382
35.4.1 Generally1382
35.4.2 Preliminary issue—the arbitrator’s powers—ss.45 and 341384
35.5 On point of law1385
35.5.1 Is the appeal within the time limits set down in the Act?1385
35.5.2 Where the appeal is out of time1387
35.5.3 Generally1390
35.5.4 Appealing on a point of law1399
35.5.5 Limitations on application to the court—s.70(2)(b)1402
35.5.6 Parties pre-consent to appeal1403
35.5.7 The court’s discretion to grant leave to appeal in respect of a question of law not argued before the arbitrator1405
35.5.8 Party seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal on decision of the High Court1406
APPENDIX 1—STATUTES1409
1.1 Arbitration Act 19501409
1.2 Arbitration Act 19751429
1.3 Arbitration Act 19791431
1.4 Arbitration Act 19961437
1.5 Civil Evidence Act 19681484
1.6 Civil Evidence Act 19721490
1.7 Civil Evidence Act 19951493
1.8 Agricultural Holdings Act 19861505
1.9 Agricultural Tenancies Act 19951510
APPENDIX 2—RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT 19971513
APPENDIX 3—DISPUTE RESOLUTION1551
3.1 CIArb Arbitration Rules (1988)1551
3.2 CIArb Short Form Arbitration Rules 19911558
3.3 CIArb Guidelines for Supervised Settlement Procedure (1990 Edition)1561
3.4 CIArb New Consumer Dispute Resolution Scheme1565
3.5 CIArb Standard Consumer Arbitration Scheme Guidance Notes for the Parties1575
3.6 Arbitration Scheme for the Association of British Travel Agents1579
3.7 Schedule of Administered Schemes1583
3.8 Guidelines of Good Practice for Arbitrators1585
3.9 The LMAA Terms (1997)1588
3.10 The LMAA Small Claims Procedure (1994)1600
3.11 The LMAA FALCA Rules (1996) (Fast and Low Cost Arbitration)1604
3.12 FOSFA Rules of Arbitration and Appeal 19901609
3.13 GAFTA Arbitration Rules No.1251616
3.14 Draft ICC Rules 19971627
3.15 Draft New LCIA Rules 19971638
3.16 The JCT Arbitration Rules (18 July 1988)1651
3.17 Draft Proposed Amended JCT Rules 19971659
3.18 JCT Contracts, Sub-Contracts and Arbitration Rules—Note to Users1670
3.19 The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors: Appointment of arbitrators and independent experts, particularly in commercial property rent review disputes—policy statement on alleged conflicts of interest1673
3.20 Institution of Civil Engineers’ Arbitration Procedure (1997)1675
3.21 The Construction Industry Model Arbitration (CIMA) Rules1686
Index1705