图书介绍
REGULATING AUDIOVISUAL SERVICESPDF|Epub|txt|kindle电子书版本网盘下载
![REGULATING AUDIOVISUAL SERVICES](https://www.shukui.net/cover/2/33930592.jpg)
- THOMAS GIBBONS 著
- 出版社: ASHGATE
- ISBN:9780754627982
- 出版时间:2009
- 标注页数:597页
- 文件大小:30MB
- 文件页数:619页
- 主题词:
PDF下载
下载说明
REGULATING AUDIOVISUAL SERVICESPDF格式电子书版下载
下载的文件为RAR压缩包。需要使用解压软件进行解压得到PDF格式图书。建议使用BT下载工具Free Download Manager进行下载,简称FDM(免费,没有广告,支持多平台)。本站资源全部打包为BT种子。所以需要使用专业的BT下载软件进行下载。如BitComet qBittorrent uTorrent等BT下载工具。迅雷目前由于本站不是热门资源。不推荐使用!后期资源热门了。安装了迅雷也可以迅雷进行下载!
(文件页数 要大于 标注页数,上中下等多册电子书除外)
注意:本站所有压缩包均有解压码: 点击下载压缩包解压工具
图书目录
PART Ⅰ CONVERGENCE AND REGULATION3
1 Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem (1996), ‘New Challenges for European Multimedia Policy: A German Perspective’, European Journal of Communication, 11,pp.327-46.3
2 Douglas W.Vick (2006), ‘Regulatory Convergence?’, Legal Studies, 26,pp.26-64.23
PART Ⅱ TECHNIQUES OF REGULATION65
3 Cass R.Sunstein (2000), ‘Television and the Public Interest’, California Law Review, 88, pp.499-564.65
4 Angela J.Campbell (1999), ‘Self Regulation and the Media’, Federal Communications Law Journal, 51, pp.711-71.131
5 Andrew Murray and Colin Scott (2002), ‘Controlling the New Media: Hybrid Responses to New Forms of Power’, Modern Law Review, 65, pp.491-516.193
6 Michael D.Birnhack and Jacob H.Rowbottom (2004), ‘Shielding Children: the European Way’, Chicago-Kent Law Review, 79, pp.175-227.219
PART Ⅲ STRUCTURAL REGULATION: MEDIA CONCENTRATION AND OWNERSHIP275
7 Rachael Craufurd Smith (2004), ‘Rethinking European Union Competence in the Field of Media Ownership: The Internal Market, Fundamental Rights and European Citizenship’, European Law Review, 29, pp.652-72.275
8 Peter Humphreys (1998), ‘The Goal of Pluralism and the Ownership Rules for Private Broadcasting in Germany: Re-Regulation or De-Regulation?’, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 16, pp.527-55.297
9 Christopher S.Yoo (2005), ‘Architectural Censorship and the FCC’, South California Law Review, 78, pp.669-731.327
10 C.Edwin Baker (2005), ‘Media Structure, Ownership Policy, and the First Amendment’, South California Law Review, 78, pp.733-62.391
11 Thomas Gibbons (2004), ‘Control over Technical Bottlenecks - A Case for Media Ownership Law?’, in Regulating Access to Digital Television, Strasbourg:European Audiovisual Observatory, pp.59-67.421
PART Ⅳ ISSUES IN REGULATING NEW MEDIA433
12 Heman Galperin and Francois Bar (2002), ‘The Regulation of Interactive Television in the United States and the European Union’, Federal Communications Law Journal, 55, pp.61-84.433
13 Natali Helberger (2006), ‘The “Right to Information” and Digital Broadcasting:About Monsters, Invisible Men and the Future of European Broadcasting Regulation’,Entertainment Law Review, 17, pp.70-80.457
14 Damien Geradin (2005), ‘Access to Content by New Media Platforms: A Review of the Competition Law Problems’, European Law Review, 30, pp.68-94.469
15 Andrew T.Kenyon and Robin Wright (2006), ‘Television as Something Special?Content Control Technologies and Free-to-air TV’, Melbourne Law Review, 30,pp.338-69.497
16 Horatia Muir Watt (2003), ‘Yahoo! Cyber-collision of Cultures: Who Regulates?’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 24, pp.673-96.529
17 Eli Noam (1998), ‘Spectrum Auctions: Yesterday’s Heresy, Today’s Orthodoxy,Tomorrow’s Anachronism.Taking the Next Step to Open Spectrum Access’,Journal of Law and Economics, 41, pp.765-90.553
18 Thomas W.Hazlett (1998), ‘Spectrum Flash Dance: Eli Noam’s Proposal for “Open Access” to Radio Waves’, Journal ofLaw and Economics, 41, pp.805-20.579
Name Index595